LINGUISTIC AFFECTIVE AND CONTEXTUAL BARRIERS TO ACADEMIC WRITING AMONG LIBYAN EFL UNDERGRADUATES A Mixed-Methods Study at the University of Zawia

Authors

  • Safia Marimi English Language Department - Faculty of Arts, University of Zawia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/aepbb487

Keywords:

academic writing; EFL undergraduates; writing difficulties; writing anxiety; first-language interference; mixed methods

Abstract

This study investigates the linguistic, affective, and contextual barriers encountered by Libyan undergraduates when completing academic writing tasks in English and explains the factors underlying those barriers from the students’ perspective. A mixed-methods triangulation design was employed, Quantitative data were obtained through an online questionnaire completed by 56 fifth- to eighth-semester students, while qualitative data were generated through semi-structured interviews with 10 students, The survey showed strong recognition of the value of writing and a high motivation to improve; nevertheless, the participants reported substantial difficulties, The highest challenge endorsements concerned vocabulary and word choice (76.8%), revision and editing (76.8%), and clear and coherent expression (71.4%), The leading contributing factors were limited exposure to English outside the classroom (71.4%), difficulty organizing and expressing ideas (69.6%), and cultural-linguistic differences (67.9%), Interview findings corroborated the quantitative patterns and revealed an interaction among limited grammatical and lexical knowledge, first-language interference, academic formality, anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, inadequate feedback, restricted resources, and insufficient practice time, The study concludes that EFL writing difficulty is not a single linguistic deficit but a multidimensional system in which language knowledge, self-efficacy, instructional conditions, and opportunities for authentic use reinforce one another, It recommends an integrated process-genre curriculum, explicit language support within meaningful writing, self-regulated learning routines, sustained reading-to-write practice, and staged feedback combining teacher, peer, and carefully supervised automated support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldayel, H. S., Pravitasari, H., & Fadillah, N. (2026), Factors affecting academic writing difficulties among English as a foreign language (EFL) university students, Acta Psychologica, 263, 106250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106250

Al-Hawamdeh, B. O. S., Hussen, N., & Abdelrasheed, N. S. G. (2023), Portfolio vs, summative assessment: Impacts on EFL learners’ writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency; self-efficacy; learning anxiety; and autonomy, Language Testing in Asia, 13, 12, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00225-5

Altikriti, S. (2022), Challenges facing Jordanian undergraduates in writing graduation research papers, Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 58–67.

Anggraeni, C. W., Mujiyanto, J., Rustipa, K., & Widhiyanto. (2025), Effects of utilizing self-regulated learning-based instruction on EFL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed-method investigation, Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10, 15, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00317-6

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing, ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160, https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153

Bacha, N. N. (2012), University students’ perceptions of the challenges of academic writing: A case study in Saudi Arabia, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 269–280.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021), Thematic analysis: A practical guide, SAGE.

Budjalemba, A. S., & Listyani, L. (2020), Factors contributing to students’ difficulties in academic writing class: Students’ perceptions, UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 135–149.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.), SAGE.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007), Research methods in applied linguistics, Oxford University Press.

Eisay, A. A. (2026). Code-Switching from Arabic to English among TV Presenters as an Indicator of Linguistic Competence and Linguistic Dominance. Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(3), 227-235.

Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016), ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors, and suggestions, Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(2), 81–92.

Hyland, K. (2022), Teaching and researching writing (4th ed.), Routledge.

Khosravi, R., Mohammadi, E., Esmaeili, N., & Zandi, H. (2023), Perfectionism and writing anxiety as predictors of Iranian EFL learners’ performance in the IELTS writing module: A multi-dimensional perspective, Frontiers in Education, 8, 1108542, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1108542

Latif, M. B., & Saeid, S. A. M. (2026). The Impact of Teaching English Literature as an Elective Course to Fourth-Year ESL Students in a University Context. Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(3), 1166-1179.

Li, M. (2024), Non-native English-speaking students’ English academic writing experiences in higher education: A meta-ethnographic qualitative synthesis, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 101430, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101430

Mamad, A., & Vígh, T. (2023), Moroccan EFL public university instructors’ perceptions and self-reported writing practices, Heliyon, 9(5), e15626, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15626

Moses, R. N., & Mohamad, M. (2019), Challenges faced by students and teachers on writing skills in ESL contexts: A literature review, Creative Education, 10, 3385–3391.

Nunan, D. (2003), Practical English language teaching, McGraw-Hill.

Rahimi, M., Fathi, J., & Zou, D. (2025), Exploring the impact of automated written corrective feedback on the academic writing skills of EFL learners: An activity theory perspective, Education and Information Technologies, 30, 2691–2735, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12896-5

Taye, T., & Mengesha, M. (2024), Identifying and analyzing common English writing challenges among regular undergraduate students, Heliyon, 10(17), e36876, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36876

Truong, H. M. (2022), Impacts of process-genre approach on EFL sophomores’ writing performance, writing self-efficacy, and writing autonomy, Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 181–195, https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12165

Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023), EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255

Downloads

Published

2026-08-03

How to Cite

LINGUISTIC AFFECTIVE AND CONTEXTUAL BARRIERS TO ACADEMIC WRITING AMONG LIBYAN EFL UNDERGRADUATES A Mixed-Methods Study at the University of Zawia. (2026). Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(ملحق 3), 1313-1335. https://doi.org/10.65405/aepbb487

Most read articles by the same author(s)