An Optimized Cascaded Cryptosystem Using AES-256 and SPECK-128
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/bfb0ts51Keywords:
AES-256, SPECK-128, Lightweight Cryptography, Cascaded Encryption, Spatial Tensor Reconstruction, Information Entropy, Differential Attack Resistance.Abstract
With the rapid proliferation of high-resolution digital media across untrusted networks, ensuring visual data confidentiality and integrity requires robust, high-throughput cryptographic architectures. Standard block ciphers applied directly to high-dimensional image payloads often introduce computational latency, spatial redundancy vulnerabilities, or bottleneck challenges when paired with legacy ciphers. This paper presents a performance and cryptographic evaluation of an optimized cascaded dual-stage image cryptosystem combining a 14-round Advanced Encryption Standard primary layer (AES-256 in Counter mode) with a secondary 32-round SPECK-128/128 lightweight block cipher stage. Plaintext images are flattened into contiguous linear byte arrays for dual-stage cipher transformations before undergoing exact 3D spatial tensor reconstruction (). We evaluate the implementation using rigorous statistical and differential security metrics—including Shannon entropy, adjacent pixel correlation analysis, Number of Pixels Change Rate (NPCR), and Unified Average Changing Intensity (UACI). Experimental results demonstrate that the AES-256 + SPECK-128 framework achieves near-ideal information entropy (), drastically reduces adjacent pixel correlation from to , and satisfies theoretical differential attack resistance baselines (, ). Furthermore, replacing legacy secondary ciphers with SPECK-128 significantly reduces execution latency, confirming the system's suitability for real-time, low-latency secure image transmission.
Downloads
References
[1] R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: Pearson, 2018.
[2] A. S. El-Fishawy and O. M. A. Zaid, “Quality Measurement of Encrypted Images,” International Journal of Network Security, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2006, doi: 10.6688/IJNS.200601.02.08.
[3] S. Lian, Multimedia Encryption and Watermarking: Security and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Springer Science & Business Media, 2008. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-75280-8.
[4] B. Schneier, Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
[5] W. Stallings, Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice, 7th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2017.
[6] C. E. Shannon, “Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 656–715, 1949, doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb00928.x.
[7] M. Zeghid, M. Machhout, L. Khriji, A. Baganne, and R. Tourki, “A Modified AES Algorithm for Image Encryption,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 20, pp. 204–208, 2007, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1082156.
[8] R. C. Merkle and M. E. Hellman, “On the Security of Multiple Encryption,” Commun. ACM, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 465–467, 1981, doi: 10.1145/358699.358718.
[9] R. Beaulieu, D. Shors, J. Smith, S. Treatman-Clark, B. Weeks, and L. Wingers, “The SIMON and SPECK families of lightweight block ciphers,” J. Cryptogr. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 273–287, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00145-017-9269-0.
[10] Y. Wu, J. P. Noonan, S. Agaian, and others, “NPCR and UACI randomness tests for image encryption,” Cyber journals: multidisciplinary journals in science and technology, Journal of Selected Areas in Telecommunications (JSAT), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 31–38, 2011.
