Dynamics of the Hellenic Subduction Arc and Seismotectonic Stability of Eastern Libya: Stress Transmission and Seismic and Tsunami Hazards on the Cyrenaica Margin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/kvz8vv50Keywords:
Hellenic subduction arc; seismotectonic stability; eastern Libya; Cyrenaica; tectonic stress transfer; fault reactivation; differential uplift; earthquakes; tsunami; slab rollback; coastal hazardsAbstract
This study examines the seismotectonic stability of eastern Libya in light of the dynamics of the Hellenic subduction arc, one of the most active and complex subduction systems in the eastern Mediterranean. It is based on the hypothesis that the Cyrenaican margin and the northeastern coast of Libya, despite their distance from the direct subduction zone, do not constitute a geodynamically isolated margin. Rather, they lie within a zone of indirect influence related to Africa–Eurasia convergence, the subduction of the African slab, slab rollback, and the redistribution of tectonic stresses across the Mediterranean Ridge.
The study adopts an integrated geodynamic–seismotectonic approach based on the analysis of slab geometry, the structural characteristics of the Hellenic subduction arc, and the southwestward motion of the Aegean block as indicated by geodetic measurements. It also examines the historical record of major seismic and tsunami events, as well as recent instrumentally recorded seismicity in the eastern Mediterranean. In addition, the study draws on Slab2 models, active fault databases, international earthquake catalogues, seismic hazard maps, and bathymetric data to interpret the relationship between regional tectonic structure and the seismotectonic sensitivity of the Cyrenaican margin.
The findings indicate that the Hellenic subduction arc is not merely a distant seismic source relative to Libya, but rather a regional geodynamic system capable of indirectly influencing the seismotectonic stability of eastern Libya through the transfer and reorganization of stresses across the eastern Mediterranean. The study also shows that variations in slab geometry, slab rollback mechanisms, and the motion of the Aegean block generate a complex stress regime involving compression, extension, and strike-slip deformation. This regime is reflected in the patterns of seismic activity observed south of Crete, in the Aegean Sea, the Ionian Sea, and the Rhodes–Kos sector.
The study further suggests that the geological structure of Cyrenaica, including inherited faults, carbonate formations, an elevated plateau, and a continental shelf connected to the Mediterranean basin, makes the region variably sensitive to changes in the regional stress field. These observations support an interpretive hypothesis that some aspects of fault reactivation and differential uplift along the Cyrenaican margin may be indirectly and testably related to the dynamics of Hellenic subduction and slab rollback, particularly through their role in reorganizing regional stresses within the eastern Mediterranean. The study also emphasizes that potential hazards along the eastern Libyan coast are not limited to local seismicity, but also include exposure to major regional seismic–tsunami events, as illustrated by the AD 365 Crete earthquake and its associated tsunami, which affected the southern shores of the Mediterranean.
The study concludes that eastern Libya should be understood as a low- to moderate-sensitivity seismotectonic margin within an active regional system, rather than as a fully stable zone. It recommends strengthening seismic and geophysical monitoring networks, developing a national database of faults and tectonic structures, preparing probabilistic models for seismic and tsunami hazards, and integrating seismotectonic considerations into coastal urban planning and risk management policies, particularly in sensitive coastal cities such as Derna, Susa, and Tobruk.
Downloads
References
1. Ambraseys, N. N. (2009). Earthquakes in the Mediterranean and Middle East: A multidisciplinary study of seismicity up to 1900. Cambridge University Press.
2. Danciu, L., Nandan, S., Reyes, C., Basili, R., Weatherill, G., Beauval, C., Rovida, A., Vilanova, S., Sesetyan, K., Bard, P.-Y., Cotton, F., Wiemer, S., & Giardini, D. (2021). The 2020 update of the European Seismic Hazard Model: Model overview. EFEHR Technical Report 001. https://doi.org/10.12686/a15
3. El-Hawat, A. S., & Shelmani, M. A. (1993). Short notes and guidebook on the geology of Al Jabal al Akhdar, Cyrenaica, NE Libya. Earth Science Society of Libya.
4. EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium. (n.d.). EMODnet Bathymetry data portal. European Marine Observation and Data Network. Accessed June 12, 2026.
5. European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre. (2024). EMSC earthquake catalogue and event information. European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre. Accessed June 12, 2026.
6. GEBCO Bathymetric Compilation Group. (2024). The GEBCO_2024 Grid: A continuous terrain model of the global oceans and land. British Oceanographic Data Centre, National Oceanography Centre. https://doi.org/10.5285/1c44ce99-0a0d-5f4f-e063-7086abc0ea0f
7. Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System. (2026). GDACS earthquake event reports. Accessed June 12, 2026.
8. GreDaSS Working Group. (n.d.). Greek Database of Seismogenic Sources (GreDaSS). Accessed June 12, 2026.
9. Guiraud, R., & Bosworth, W. (1997). Senonian basin inversion and rejuvenation of rifting in Africa and Arabia: Synthesis and implications to plate-scale tectonics. Tectonophysics, 282(1–4), 39–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00212-6
10. Hayes, G. P., Moore, G. L., Portner, D. E., Hearne, M., Flamme, H., Furtney, M., & Smoczyk, G. M. (2018). Slab2, a comprehensive subduction zone geometry model. Science, 362(6410), 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat4723
11. Jolivet, L., & Faccenna, C. (2000). Mediterranean extension and the Africa–Eurasia collision. Tectonics, 19(6), 1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000TC900018
12. Kiratzi, A., & Louvari, E. (2003). Focal mechanisms of shallow earthquakes in the Aegean Sea and the surrounding lands determined by waveform modelling: A new database. Journal of Geodynamics, 36(1–2), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(03)00050-4
13. Kopf, A., Mascle, J., & Klaeschen, D. (2003). The Mediterranean Ridge: A mass balance across the fastest growing accretionary complex on Earth. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B8), 2372. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000473
14. Le Pichon, X., & Angelier, J. (1979). The Hellenic arc and trench system: A key to the neotectonic evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean area. Tectonophysics, 60(1–2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(79)90131-8
15. Le Pichon, X., & Kreemer, C. (2010). The Miocene-to-present kinematic evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East and its implications for dynamics. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 38, 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152419
16. Mascle, J., & Chaumillon, E. (1998). An overview of Mediterranean Ridge collisional accretionary complex as deduced from multichannel seismic data. Geo-Marine Letters, 18, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003670050058
17. McClusky, S., Balassanian, S., Barka, A., Demir, C., Ergintav, S., Georgiev, I., Gurkan, O., Hamburger, M., Hurst, K., Kahle, H., Kastens, K., Kekelidze, G., King, R., Kotzev, V., Lenk, O., Mahmoud, S., Mishin, A., Nadariya, M., Ouzounis, A., Paradissis, D., Peter, Y., Prilepin, M., Reilinger, R., Sanli, I., Seeger, H., Tealeb, A., Toksöz, M. N., & Veis, G. (2000). Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 105(B3), 5695–5719. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900351
18. McKenzie, D. (1978). Active tectonics of the Alpine–Himalayan belt: The Aegean Sea and surrounding regions. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 55(1), 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1978.tb04759.x
19. Nocquet, J.-M. (2012). Present-day kinematics of the Mediterranean: A comprehensive overview of GPS results. Tectonophysics, 579, 220–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.03.037
20. Papadopoulos, G. A. (2009). Tsunamis in the Mediterranean Sea. In J. C. Woodward (Ed.), The physical geography of the Mediterranean (pp. 493–512). Oxford University Press.
21. Papazachos, B. C., & Comninakis, P. E. (1971). Geophysical and tectonic features of the Aegean Arc. Journal of Geophysical Research, 76(35), 8517–8533. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB076i035p08517
22. Piper, D. J. W., & Perissoratis, C. (2003). Quaternary neotectonics and submarine mass movements in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean region. Marine Geology, 196(1–2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00040-7
23. Polonia, A., Bonatti, E., Camerlenghi, A., Lucchi, R. G., Panieri, G., & Gasperini, L. (2013). Mediterranean megaturbidite triggered by the AD 365 Crete earthquake and tsunami. Scientific Reports, 3, 1285. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01285
24. Reilinger, R., McClusky, S., Vernant, P., Lawrence, S., Ergintav, S., Cakmak, R., Ozener, H., Kadirov, F., Guliev, I., Stepanyan, R., Nadariya, M., Hahubia, G., Mahmoud, S., Sakr, K., ArRajehi, A., Paradissis, D., Al-Aydrus, A., Prilepin, M., Guseva, T., Evren, E., Dmitrotsa, A.,
25. Filikov, S. V., Gomez, F., Al-Ghazzi, R., & Karam, G. (2006). GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa–Arabia–Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111, B05411. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004051
26. Royden, L. H., & Papanikolaou, D. J. (2011). Slab segmentation and late Cenozoic disruption of the Hellenic arc. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 12(3), Q03010. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003280
27. Alriheebi, R. A. (2026). Integrated Modeling and Mult objective Control of Multilevel DC/AC Inverters for Conducted Electromagnetic Interference Mitigation. Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(3), 897-925.
28. Stiros, S. C. (2010). The 8.5+ magnitude, AD 365 earthquake in Crete: Coastal uplift, topography changes, archaeological and historical signature. Quaternary International, 216(1–2), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2009.05.005
29. Styron, R., & Pagani, M. (2020). The GEM Global Active Faults Database. Earthquake Spectra, 36(1_suppl), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020944182
30. U.S. Geological Survey. (2024). USGS earthquake catalogue and event pages. United States Geological Survey. Accessed June 12, 2026.
31. Vernant, P., Reilinger, R., & McClusky, S. (2014). Geodetic evidence for low coupling on the Hellenic subduction plate interface. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 385, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.10.018
ملاحظة منهجية للمراجع الإلكترونية:
تاريخ الاطلاع على قواعد البيانات الزلزالية والخرائط الرقمية: 12 يونيو 2026.











