Design and Usability Evaluation of a Voice-Enabled Healthcare Appointment Booking Prototype for Older Adults in Libya: A Preliminary Usability Study

Authors

  • Marwa ALfordag University of Zawiya, Faculty Engineering, Dep. of Computer Engineering and Computer Since Author
  • Fathi A. Hamhoum University of Zawiya, Faculty Engineering, Dep. of Computer Engineering and Computer Since Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/ab95z055

Keywords:

Voice User Interface, Healthcare Applications, Older Adults, Usability Evaluation, Human–Computer Interaction, Accessibility, Appointment Booking, Libya

Abstract

The increasing adoption of mobile healthcare applications has transformed how patients access healthcare services, communicate with healthcare providers, and schedule medical appointments. Despite these advancements, older adults often encounter challenges when interacting with healthcare applications due to age-related changes in vision, memory, motor skills, and limited familiarity with digital technologies. Voice-enabled interfaces have emerged as a promising approach to improve accessibility and simplify user interaction. This study presents the design and usability evaluation of a voice-enabled healthcare appointment booking prototype developed specifically for older adults in Libya. The prototype was designed using Figma and incorporated a conceptual voice interaction mechanism intended to support appointment scheduling through a simplified interaction process. A usability evaluation was conducted involving eleven participants aged 50 years and above. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that assessed ease of use, interface clarity, user understanding, interaction preferences, and perceived usefulness. The findings indicate that 81.8% of participants considered the prototype easy or very easy to use, while 90.9% reported that the interface elements were clear and understandable. Most participants completed the interaction process without significant difficulties. Although participants did not exclusively prefer voice interaction, many expressed interest in combining voice and touch-based interaction methods. The study demonstrates the potential of voice-enabled design concepts to improve healthcare accessibility for older adults and provides preliminary evidence supporting the future development of voice-oriented healthcare applications within the Libyan context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Q. Wang, J. Liu, L. Zhou, J. Tian, X. Chen, W. Zhang, H. Wang, W. Zhou, and Y. Gao, “Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: A scoping review,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 22, no. 317, 2022.

[2] B. Stigall and K. Caine, “A Systematic Review of Human Factors Literature About Voice User Interfaces and Older Adults,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2020.

[3] A. Arnold, S. Kolody, A. Comeau, and A. M. Cruz, “What does the literature say about the use of personal voice assistants in older adults? A scoping review,” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, vol. 19, no. 1, 2024.

[4] P. Kokorelias et al., “Older Adults’ Experiences with Voice-Activated Virtual Home Assistants: A Scoping Review,” Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 2024.

[5] World Health Organization, Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2021.

[6] S. J. Czaja and C. C. Lee, “The impact of aging on access to technology,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 341–349, 2007.

[7] A. D. Fisk, W. A. Rogers, N. Charness, S. J. Czaja, and J. Sharit, Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2018.

[8] M. McTear, Voice User Interface Design. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020.

[9] M. Pearl, Designing Voice User Interfaces. Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly Media, 2016.

[10] H. Sharp, Y. Rogers, and J. Preece, Interaction Design: Beyond Human–Computer Interaction, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2019.

[11] B. Shneiderman et al., Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human–Computer Interaction, 6th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2017.

[12] X. Hu et al., “Co-Designing Voice User Interfaces for Older Adults,” 2024.

[13] Y. A. Kumah-Crystal, C. J. Pirtle, H. M. Whyte, E. S. Goode, S. H. Anders, and C. U. Lehmann, “Electronic Health Record Interactions Through Voice: A Review,” Applied Clinical Informatics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 541–552, 2018.

[14] J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 1994.

[15] D. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things, Revised and Expanded Edition. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, 2013.

[16] A. Dix, J. Finlay, G. Abowd, and R. Beale, Human–Computer Interaction, 3rd ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson, 2004.

[17] ISO 9241-11, Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction—Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2018.

[18] J. Brooke, “SUS: A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale,” in Usability Evaluation in Industry. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 1996.

[19] A. Vaportzis, M. Clausen, and A. Gow, “Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interaction,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, 2017.

[20] Alnnale, T. (2026). Predictive Governance in Digital Enterprises: An LSTM-Enhanced Deep Learning Framework for Economic Optimization of IT Incident Management Using Enriched Process Logs. Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(3), 86-113.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

Design and Usability Evaluation of a Voice-Enabled Healthcare Appointment Booking Prototype for Older Adults in Libya: A Preliminary Usability Study. (2026). Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(3), 1132-1145. https://doi.org/10.65405/ab95z055

Most read articles by the same author(s)