Aesthetic alienation among female students at Al-Zahraa College of Education: A descriptive and analytical study in the psychology of contemporary alienation

Authors

  • Abtisam Ali Mohammed Raqeem Department of Psychology, Aljafara University, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/tptgyp89

Keywords:

Aesthetic Alienation, Contemporary Alienation, Psychology of Beauty, Female Education Students, Aesthetic Education

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the levels of aesthetic alienation among female students at Al-Zahraa College of Education, examining the psychological and social dimensions contributing to contemporary alienation in relation to aesthetic experience. Employing a descriptive-analytical approach, the study sampled 232 female students during the 2025-2026 academic year, selected through stratified random sampling. A researcher-designed Aesthetic Alienation Questionnaire comprising 42 items across five dimensions—sensory alienation, emotional alienation, cognitive-aesthetic alienation, socio-cultural alienation, and digital alienation—was utilized. Findings revealed a moderately high level of aesthetic alienation, with digital and sensory alienation dimensions scoring highest. Statistically significant differences were found related to academic level, favoring advanced-year students, while no significant differences emerged regarding specialization. The study concluded with recommendations emphasizing the integration of aesthetic education into academic curricula and the enhancement of artistic appreciation spaces within the university environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Wen, J., & Senarith, P. (2026). Research on College Students' Emotional Alienation in the Context of Digital Education: A Case Study of Wuhan College of Arts and Sciences.‏

2. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

3. Fromm, E. (1955). The sane society. New York: Rinehart & Company.

4. Gadamer, H.-G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

5. Al-Makhram, A. A. H. M. (2026). The Impact of Technological Development on the Design and Construction of Sustainable Buildings. Shihab Journal of Humanities, 2(2), 1-15.

6. Han, B.-C. (2017). Saving beauty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

7. Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Phänomenologie des Geistes. Bamberg: Goebhardt.

8. hooks, b. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.

9. Kierkegaard, S. (1844). The concept of anxiety. Copenhagen: Reitzel.

10. Marx, K. (1844). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

11. Schiller, F. (2004). On the aesthetic education of man (E. M. Wilkinson & L. A. Willoughby, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1795).

12. Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 783-791.

13. Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

14. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

15. Yılmaz, A., & Kaya, S. (2023). Aesthetic alienation in the digital age: A study on university students in Turkey. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 57(2), 112-134.

16. Erdogan, N., & Kayaalp, E. (Eds.). (2025). Exploring past images in a digital age: Reinventing the Archive. Taylor & Francis.‏

17. Metha, A. (1972). Existential Frustration and Psychological Anomie within Select College Student Subcultures.‏

18. Ben Dalla, L, O, F. (2021).Literature review (LR) on the powerful of Research methodology processes life cycle. In 2021 The Powerful of Research Methodology Processes Life Cycle Conference (TPRMPLCC) (pp. 1-10). IEEE.‏ https://doi.org/10.16543/TPRMPLCC 50717.2020.92876580

19. Ben Dalla, L, O, F. (2021). Literature review (LR) on the dominant of Research methodology. Conference (LRDRMC) (pp. 1-14). IEEE.‏ https://doi.org/10.6754/LRDRMC56412.2020.45987623

20. Rifino, M. (2026). A Critical Lens on Emotions and Learning: Shame, Loneliness, and Alienation in Community College (Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York).‏

21. TenHouten, W. (2016). Alienation and affect. Taylor & Francis.‏

22. Perryman, L. A. (2011). Alienation and educational inclusion: a mixed methods study of teaching and learning with contemporary art in the Level 1 university curriculum. Open University (United Kingdom).‏

23. Koresh, M. A., & Abzabez, A. A. (2026). The Future of the Libyan-European Geoeconomic Partnership in the Era of Global Energy Transition: A Conceptual Framework of Complex Interdependence. Shihab Journal of Humanities, 2(2), 16-21.

24. Allison, J. R. (2026). Alienation on Campus: Students, Agency, and a'Praxis of Possibility'.‏

25. Rifino, M. (2026). A Critical Lens on Emotions and Learning: Shame, Loneliness, and Alienation in Community College (Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York).‏

26. Alnnale, T. (2026). The Role of Entrepreneurship in Driving Operational and Economic Efficiency in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): An Analytical Framework. Shihab Journal of Humanities, 2(2), 44-52.

27. BOULBAZINE, H., & BOUZID, F. (2026). Psychosocial Alienation Among Digital Content Followers on TikTok: The Structural Friction Between Virtual and Real Identities A Digital Ethnographic Study. Revista Universitară de Sociologie, 22(1), 234.‏

28. Soltani Shal, E., Ghodrati, S., & Ghodrati, H. (2025). Cosmetic Surgery Industry: Spontaneity or Alienation of Women. Journal of Industrial Sociology, 1(1), 189-215.‏

Downloads

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Aesthetic alienation among female students at Al-Zahraa College of Education: A descriptive and analytical study in the psychology of contemporary alienation. (2026). Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(1), 720-728. https://doi.org/10.65405/tptgyp89

Most read articles by the same author(s)