Embodied Cognition or Abstract Representation? Testing Competing Accounts of Transparent and Opaque English Idiom Learning through Augmented Reality

• Al-Hammadi, F. S., & Sidek, H. M. (2018). Academic writing challenges encountered by Libyan EFL university students. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(4), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.4p.14

• Al-Houti, S. K., & Aldaihani, H. A. (2022). Idiom avoidance in L2 writing: The case of Arab EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(2), 822–836. https://www.jlls.org

• Alhaysony, M. (2017). Strategies and difficulties of understanding English idioms: A case study of Saudi EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n3p70

• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149

• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

• Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2008). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199161

• Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr195oa

• Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F. K. (2022). A meta-analysis of augmented reality in K–12 and higher education language learning. Educational Research Review, 35, 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100434

• Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2023). Eye-tracking L2 idiom processing: The role of transparency and context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000321

• Chen, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2020). Interactive augmented reality game-based vocabulary learning. Computers & Education, 154, 103928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103928

• Chen, Y. L., & Hsu, C. C. (2020). Self-regulated mobile game-based English learning in a virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 154, 103910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103910

• Chen, M. P., Liu, Y. L., & Huang, Y. M. (2020). Effects of augmented reality-based multidimensional concept maps on students’ learning achievement, motivation and acceptance. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19, 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00697-y

• Cieślicka, A. B. (2015). Idiom acquisition and processing by second/foreign language learners. In R. R. Heredia & A. B. Cieślicka (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp. 208–244). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342100.012

• Fernando, C. (1996). Idioms and idiomaticity. Oxford University Press.

• Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Harvard University Press.

• Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.

• Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Augmented reality and language learning: From annotated vocabulary to place-based mobile games. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 9–19. https://doi.org/10125/44475

• Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2022). Vector-space models of semantic representation: A critical overview. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 1214–1239. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02035-5

• Hsu, T. C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter? Computers & Education, 106, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.007

• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.

• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211

• Liao, Y., & Fukuya, Y. J. (2023). Avoidance of phrasal verbs and idioms: A longitudinal study of Chinese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1125–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3201

• Latif, M. B., & Saeid, S. A. M. (2026). The Impact of Teaching English Literature as an Elective Course to Fourth-Year ESL Students in a University Context. Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(3), 1166-1179.

• Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2008). The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1103–1121. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1103

• Lin, V., & Yu, Y. T. (2023). Augmented reality in K–12 language education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 193, 104661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104661

• Macedonia, M., & Mueller, K. (2016). Exploring the neural representation of novel words learned through enactment in a word learning paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00953

• Macedonia, M., & Repetto, C. (2022). Why gesture aids vocabulary learning: A meta-analytic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 138, 104726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104726

• Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary note and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316684904

• Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

• Parmaxi, A., & Demetriou, A. A. (2022). Augmented reality in language learning: A state-of-the-art review. CALICO Journal, 39(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.41673

• Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079

• Rhema, A., & Miliszewska, I. (2012). Towards e-learning in higher education in Libya. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 423–437. https://doi.org/10.28945/1680

• Steinel, M. P., Hulstijn, J. H., & Steinel, W. (2007). Second language idiom learning in a paired-associate paradigm: Effects of direction of learning, direction of testing, idiom imageability, and idiom transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(3), 449–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070271

• Sweller, N., Shinooka-Phelan, A., & Austin, E. E. (2023). Gesture and L2 vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 73(2), 522–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12528

• Taghizadeh, M., & Hajizadeh, S. (2023). Immersive technologies for L2 figurative language acquisition: A scoping review. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(8), 4802–4820. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2121730

• University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. (2001). Quick Placement Test. Oxford University Press.

• Vasiljevic, Z. (2015). Teaching and learning idioms in L2: From theory to practice. MexTESOL Journal, 39(3), 1–24.

• Wen, J. M., Lee, C. C., Chen, C. H., & Huang, Y. M. (2019). Effects of an augmented reality-based mobile learning system on students’ learning achievements and motivation for English idioms. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1460388

• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322

• Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772