Preliminary Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of an Ethanolic Extract from Commercial Chlorella vulgaris Powder Against Two Reference Bacterial Strains

Authors

  • Halima Awad Fathalla Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Derna, Derna, Libya Author
  • Ashraf Soliman Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Derna, Derna, Libya Author
  • Intisar Awad Al Adli Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Derna, Derna, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/x4d9y638

Keywords:

antibacterial activity, Chlorella vulgaris, disk diffusion, ethanolic extract, microalgae, preliminary screening

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is a growing clinical challenge, particularly among Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, prompting interest in natural antimicrobial agents such as microalgae. To evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of an ethanolic extract prepared from commercial Chlorella vulgaris powder against reference strains of K. pneumoniae (ATCC 13883) and S. aureus (ATCC 25923). Three extract concentrations (100, 50, and 10 mg/mL) were tested using the disk diffusion method alongside standard antibiotics, in triplicate. Total inhibition diameters were recorded, and the 6 mm disk diameter was subtracted to obtain net inhibition zones. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post-hoc test. Treatment significantly affected inhibition zone size (F(6,28) = 262.58, P < 0.001), while bacterial species alone had no significant effect (P = 0.456) and the treatment × species interaction was not significant (P = 0.114). A dose-dependent increase was observed; at 100 mg/mL, mean net inhibition zones reached 12.33 ± 2.52 mm for K. pneumoniae and 10.33 ± 1.53 mm for S. aureus. The ethanolic extract of commercial C. vulgaris powder exhibited detectable, dose-dependent antibacterial activity against both reference strains, warranting further MIC, MBC, and chemical characterisation studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ventola CL. The antibiotic resistance crisis: Part 1: causes and threats. P T 2015; 40(4):277-283.

2. Rice LB. Federal funding for antimicrobial resistance. J Infect Dis 2008; 197(8):1079-1081. http://doi.org/10.1086/533452

3. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2023 [cited 2026 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance

4. Becker EW. Micro-algae as a source of protein. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25(2):207-210. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.002

5. Safi C, Zebib B, Merah O, Pontalier PY, Vaca-Garcia C. Morphology, composition, production, processing and applications of Chlorella vulgaris: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014; 35:265-278. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.007

6. Pradhan B, Patra S, Dash SR, Behera C. Evaluation of the anti-bacterial activity of methanolic extract of Chlorella vulgaris Beyerinck [Beijerinck] with special reference to antioxidant modulation. Future J Pharm Sci 2021; 7(1):17. http://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-020-00172-5

7. Desbois AP, Smith VJ. Antibacterial free fatty acids: activities, mechanisms of action and biotechnological potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010; 85:1629-1642. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2355-3

8. Cushnie TPT, Lamb AJ. Recent advances in understanding the antibacterial properties of flavonoids. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2011; 38(2):99-107. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.02.014

9. Georgiopoulou I, Tzima K, Louli V, Magoulas K. Experimental design and optimization of recovering bioactive compounds from Chlorella vulgaris through conventional extraction. Molecules 2021; 27(1):29. http://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010029

10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (M100-S22). Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2012.

11. Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. J Pharm Anal 2016; 6(2):71-79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005

12. Tüney İ, Çadırcı BH, Ünal D, Sukatar A. Antimicrobial activities of the extracts of marine algae from the coast of Urla (İzmir, Turkey). Turk J Biol 2006; 30(3):171-175.

13. Mashhadinejad A, Zamani H, Sarmad J. Effect of growth conditions and extraction solvents on enhancement of antimicrobial activity of the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. Pharm Biomed Res 2016; 2(4):65-73. http://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.pbr.2.4.65

14. Abobaker H, Ibrahim N, Shaieb F. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of some algae isolated from Waterfall Derna, Libya. Zenodo 2023. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8076278

15. Ouzakar S, Skali Senhaji N, El Harsal A, Abrini J. Synergistic interaction between Chlorella vulgaris extract and Origanum elongatum essential oil against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int Microbiol 2024; 28(4):691-701. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-024-00576-w

16. Nesrullah Z, Al-Rubaiee G, Heikmat Zaki N. Evaluation the effect of Oscillatoria limnetica and Chlorella vulgaris extracts and their fatty acids on pathogenic bacteria isolated from burn and surgical patients. Iraqi J Pharm Sci 2024; 33(4):219-237. http://doi.org/10.31351/vol33iss4pp219-237

17. Ouzakar S, Skali Senhaji N, Rigano F, Cafarella C, Kounnoun A, Cacciola F, et al. Chlorella vulgaris as a producer of lipids for antibacterial, antibiofilm and antifungal properties. Nat Prod Res 2025:1-9. http://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2025.2462115

18. Sukhikh S, Prosekov A, Ivanova S, Maslennikov P, Andreeva A, Budenkova E, et al. Identification of metabolites with antibacterial activities by analyzing the FTIR spectra of microalgae. Life 2022; 12(9):1395. http://doi.org/10.3390/life12091395

19. Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A. Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng 2006; 101(2):87-96. http://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.101.87

20. Vigani M, Parisi C, Rodríguez-Cerezo E, Barbosa MJ, Sijtsma L, Ploeg M, et al. Food and feed products from microalgae: market opportunities and challenges for the EU. Trends Food Sci Technol 2015; 42(1):81-92. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2014.12.004

21. Morowvat MH, Kazemi K, Jaberi MA, Amini A, Gholami A. Biosynthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Chlorella vulgaris biomass against multidrug-resistant pathogens. Materials 2023; 16(2):842. http://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020842

22. Shlibak, Awatef Ali, Mehmet Örgeç, and Nusret Zencirci. "Wheat landraces versus resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses." In Wheat landraces, pp. 193-214. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.

23. Soliman, Ashraf, Awatef Shlibak, and Nusret Zencirci. "Wheat Fungal Diseases: A Review." Wadi Alshatti University Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences (2026): 191-198.

24. Soliman, Ashraf, Awatef Shlibak, and Souhaib ELfaraikh. "Response of Two Libyan Wheat Cultivars (Triticum turgidum L. and Triticum aestivum L.) to Cadmium Stress: Growth Parameters, Germination, and Seedling Vigor." Scientific Journal for Publishing in Health Research and Technology (2026): 262-272.

25. Shlibak, Awatef Ali, Mohamed Alshintari, Mohamed Ali Salem, Hajer Elgheriani, Asma Aban, Nahla Alkrimi, Wesal Almuzoughi, and Eman Belaid. "Comparative In Vitro Activity of Ceftriaxone (Ceftriaxone) and Clarithromycin Formulations Against Standard Bacterial Strains."

26. Alshintari, Mohamed, Awatef Ali Shlibak, Doaa Abeid, Hadeel Daas, Arwa Alburgi, and Masara Algali. "Evaluating the Efficacy and Stability of Expired Ciprofloxacin: A Comprehensive Assessment." Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences 2, no. 1 (2026): 546-560.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-25

How to Cite

Preliminary Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of an Ethanolic Extract from Commercial Chlorella vulgaris Powder Against Two Reference Bacterial Strains. (2026). Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(ملحق 3), 2240-2247. https://doi.org/10.65405/x4d9y638

Most read articles by the same author(s)