NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS UNDER COMBINED LOADING: A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF ACI 318M-25 AND EUROCODE 8 PROVISIONS

المؤلفون

  • Wasfi Kirallah Albadry Faculty of Engineering, University of Benghazi, Libya Author
  • Ali AL-Zwai Faculty of Engineering, University of Benghazi, Libya Author
  • Gosn Mohammed Elkofry Faculty of Engineering, University of Sirt, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/jwdra988

الكلمات المفتاحية:

RC shear walls; nonlinear behavior; ACI 318M-25; Eurocode 8; effective stiffness; plastic hinge; seismic design; finite element modeling

الملخص

Reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls are the primary lateral load-resisting system in mid- and high-rise buildings. Increasing architectural complexity now subjects many of these walls to combined axial force, bending moment, shear, and torsion acting simultaneously, producing a highly nonlinear response governed by concrete cracking, reinforcement yielding, stiffness degradation, and progressive damage. This paper reviews experimental and numerical studies published between 2004 and 2025 on the nonlinear behavior of RC shear walls and compares how the American code ACI 318M-25 and the European code Eurocode 8 (together with Eurocode 2) treat the key design parameters that govern this behavior, namely effective cracked-section stiffness, longitudinal and transverse reinforcement ratios, inter-story drift limits, base-shear calculation, and plastic-hinge location. The review shows that both codes rely on simplified, largely empirical stiffness-reduction factors, about 65% for ACI 318M versus 50% for Eurocode 8-Part 1, that do not capture the true, load-dependent nature of cracked-section stiffness; that reinforcement ratio limits differ substantially between the two codes; and that neither code, nor the related Turkish seismic code, provides a closed-form expression for plastic-hinge length as a function of wall geometry and reinforcement ratio. Persistent gaps are identified regarding FRP-reinforced walls, non-rectangular wall shapes (U, L, T, coupled and perforated walls), and boundary-element/stiffness interaction, and directions for future analytical and design-oriented research are proposed.

التنزيلات

تنزيل البيانات ليس متاحًا بعد.

المراجع

Aydin, A., Bayrak, B., Maali, M., Kılıç, M., & Alcan, H. (2020). Shear wall design within the light of prominent standards. Civil Engineering Beyond Limits, 4, 13–19.

Birely, A., Lehman, D., Lowes, L., Kuchma, D., Hart, C., & Marley, K. (2008). Investigation of the seismic behavior and analysis of reinforced concrete structural walls. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.

Çavdar, Ö., & Bayraktar, E. (2018). Earthquake performance of reinforced-concrete shear-wall structure using nonlinear methods. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities.

Chaudhari, S., & Chakrabarti, M. (2012). Modeling of concrete for nonlinear analysis using finite element code ABAQUS. International Journal of Computer Applications.

Fethi, M., & Orakcal, K. (2014). Nonlinear finite element modeling of reinforced concrete structural walls. Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul.

Forough, S., & Yüksel, B. (2020). Investigation of nonlinear behavior of high ductility reinforced concrete shear walls. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, 116–128.

Forough, S., & Yüksel, B. (2021). Effective flexural stiffness for reinforced concrete shear walls having confined boundary elements. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics, 129–139.

Foroughi, S., & Yuksel, B. (2025). A new approach to determine the flexural stiffness coefficient for reinforced concrete shear walls according to non-linear behaviour. International Journal of Integrated, 213–231.

Hasanzadeh, A., Vatin, N. I., & Kharun, M. (2025). An investigation on the nonlinear dynamic behavior of reinforced concrete shear wall under seismic loading. Magazine of Civil Engineering.

Hassan, W., Anwar, N., Norachan, P., & Najam, F. (2018). The seismic performance evaluation of RC high-rise buildings designed to various building codes. IABSE Conference — Engineering the Developing World, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Kelly, T. (2004). Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete shear wall structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 156–180.

Kotronis, P., Ragueneau, F., & Mazars, J. (2005). A simplified modelling strategy for R/C walls satisfying PS92 and EC8 design. Engineering Structures, 1197–1208.

Al-Mafalani, R. (2014). Study of the effect of dimensional variables on the behavior of reinforced concrete shear walls under seismic loading [Master's thesis]. Damascus, Syria.

Oussadou, S. E. (2021). Comparison of the provisions of ACI318-19 code and Eurocode on the structural design and cost analysis of a high-rise concrete building subjected to seismic and wind forces [Master's thesis]. Dubai.

Panagiotou, M. (2008). Seismic design, testing and analysis of reinforced concrete wall buildings [Doctoral dissertation]. University of California, San Diego.

التنزيلات

منشور

2026-09-16

كيفية الاقتباس

NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS UNDER COMBINED LOADING: A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF ACI 318M-25 AND EUROCODE 8 PROVISIONS. (2026). مجلة الفاروق للعلوم, 2(4), 370-376. https://doi.org/10.65405/jwdra988