Mode and Proficiency Effects in EFL Learner Production: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Written Essays and Spoken Monologues in ICNALE

المؤلفون

  • Raga Fatthallah Rafa Department of English, Faculty of Arts, Tobruk University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/e5r9ap68

الكلمات المفتاحية:

learner corpus; ICNALE; EFL writing; spoken monologues; proficiency; lexical density; TESOL pedagogy

الملخص

This empirical corpus-based TESOL study examines mode and proficiency effects in EFL learner production through a planned comparison of written essays and spoken monologues in the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English (ICNALE). The study focuses on how lexical, grammatical, and selected discourse features vary across written and spoken learner output, and how these patterns interact with proficiency level. Using a quantitative comparative corpus design, the study will analyze measures such as word count, lexical density, lexical diversity, academic vocabulary use, syntactic complexity, discourse markers, stance markers, and selected fluency-related transcript features where available. At this draft stage, the final ICNALE sample, feature counts, statistical outputs, and figures have not yet been supplied; therefore, all numerical findings are marked for author completion and verification. The manuscript is structured to allow the author to insert verified values after registering for ICNALE access, selecting comparable prompts, cleaning the dataset, and completing the analysis. The expected contribution is a mode-sensitive account of learner production that may inform integrated TESOL writing and speaking instruction, proficiency-sensitive assessment, and corpus-informed materials development. The paper differs from corpus-literacy or teacher-education review work by focusing on empirical learner-language evidence rather than teachers’ corpus-use knowledge.

التنزيلات

تنزيل البيانات ليس متاحًا بعد.

المراجع

Abobaker, K. M., & Adlali, R. M. (2026). Teacher Talk and Learner Response: A Discourse Study of Oral Feedback in Speaking Classes in Libya. Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(3), 1190-1203. https://doi.org/10.65405/mp48pm62

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024

Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483

Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224

Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59-84.

Gilquin, G. (2015). From design to collection of learner corpora. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 9-34). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.002

Granger, S. (2015). Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra

Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414

Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048

Ishikawa, S. (2013). The ICNALE and sophisticated contrastive interlanguage analysis of Asian learners of English. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Learner corpus studies in Asia and the world (Vol. 1, pp. 91-118). Kobe University.

Ishikawa, S. (2014). Design of the ICNALE Spoken: A new database for multi-modal contrastive interlanguage analysis. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Learner corpus studies in Asia and the world (Vol. 2, pp. 63-76). Kobe University.

Ishikawa, S. (2023). The ICNALE guide: An introduction to a learner corpus study on Asian learners' L2 English. Routledge.

Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu

Latif, M. B., & Saeid, S. A. M. (2026). The Impact of Teaching English Literature as an Elective Course to Fourth-Year ESL Students in a University Context. Al-Farooq Journal of Sciences, 2(3), 1166-1179. https://doi.org/10.65405/mfh93672

Paquot, M. (2019). The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research, 35(1), 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317694221

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047

التنزيلات

منشور

2026-07-17

كيفية الاقتباس

Mode and Proficiency Effects in EFL Learner Production: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Written Essays and Spoken Monologues in ICNALE. (2026). مجلة الفاروق للعلوم, 2(ملحق 3), 617-630. https://doi.org/10.65405/e5r9ap68