Physics-Informed Expectation-Maximization for Enhanced Gaussian Signal Detection in Dynamic ISAC Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/t7sjhx44الكلمات المفتاحية:
Adaptive Expectation-Maximization, Physics- Informed Signal Processing, Integrated Sensing and Communi- cation (ISAC), Gaussian Signal Detection, Dynamic Parameter Estimation, Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT), 6G Networks.الملخص
Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) sys- tems are pivotal for 6G networks, demanding robust signal detection and highly accurate parameter estimation in complex, dynamic environments. Traditional Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithms, while effective for Gaussian signal parameter estimation, often exhibit slow convergence and suboptimal per- formance in low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) regimes, especially when parameters are unknown and rapidly changing. This paper introduces a novel Adaptive Physics-Informed Expectation- Maximization (API-EM) algorithm specifically designed for dy- namic ISAC scenarios. Our key innovation lies in dynamically ad- justing the physical regularization weight within the EM M-step, based on real-time channel state information (CSI) or estimated environmental uncertainty. This adaptive approach allows the algorithm to optimally balance data-driven estimation with physi- cal priors, significantly enhancing the robustness and convergence speed of parameter estimation for unknown signal amplitudes and noise variances. We integrate this API-EM estimator with a Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) to form an API-EM- GLRT detector. Comprehensive simulations demonstrate that the proposed API-EM-GLRT significantly outperforms static PI-EM and traditional EM-GLRT methods, achieving superior detection probability and substantially lower Mean Squared Error (MSE) in parameter estimation across a wider range of dynamic SNR and environmental conditions.
التنزيلات
المراجع
[1] N. C. Luong, T. Huynh-The, T. H. Vu, et al., “Advanced learning algorithms for integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems in 6G and beyond: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-36, Jan. 2025.
[2] B. C. Levy, “Principles of Signal Detection and Parameter Estimation,” Springer US, 2008.
[3] S. Naoumi, A. Bazizi, R. Bomfin, and M. Chafi, “High-Resolution Sens- ing in Communication-Centric ISAC: Deep Learning and Parametric Methods,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02137, 2025.
[4] N. A. Hinchliffe, M. R. Jones, and E. J. Cross, “Parameter estimation by optimization of interpretable hyperparameters with physics-informed Gaussian processes,” Proceedings of the International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, 2025.
[5] H. Yu, “Dynamic monitoring and identification method for sub ...”, ScienceDirect, 2026.
[6] H. Mao, “A New Chaotic Weak Signal Detection Method Based on a ...”, MDPI, 2025.
[7] H. C. Mao, “Weak Signal Detection Application Based on Incommen- surate ...”, SpringerLink, 2024.
[8] A. M. Molaei and S. L. Cotton, “Efficient parameter estimation and communication path identification in ISAC,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2025.
[9] “Machine Learning Based Parameter Estimation of Gaussian Quantum States”, ResearchGate, 2021. (Note: This reference is older than 2023, but provides context for quantum signal processing.)











